The Equal Rights Amendment
 
Fasttrack to America's Past
Return to
Originating Page







A proposed Equal Rights Amendment
(ERA) divided public opinion in the 1970s


    The Equal Rights Amendment was proposed as a way to help women win full legal equality with men.  From the very beginning, however, it divided public opinion.
 
   Many people, for example, feared the proposed amendment might eliminate laws intended to protect women, such a workplace safety laws and laws granting women maternity leave from work for childbirth.

   In 1972 Congress approved the amendment and sent it to the states for ratification (approval).  The main section of the proposed amendment is shown below:





The Equal Rights Amendment (proposed)

    Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.








The ERA failed to be ratified

   At first it looked like the amendment would easily be approved by the required 38 states.  When the time limit for ratification (7 years) ended, however, only 35 states had ratified it.

   Opposition grew during the 1970s from women and men who said the amendment was unnecessary, since the Constitution already guarantees equal rights for all citizens.
  Opponents also feared that the proposed amendment might eliminate laws intended to protect women, such a workplace safety laws and laws granting women maternity leave from work for childbirth.

   Although the ERA did not become an amendment to the Constitution, the debates about the issue led to many new laws at both the national and state level designed to guarantee equal rights for women in all areas of life.



Below:  A rally outside the White House by women opposed to the ERA. 
They argued that the ERA would not help women, but only create endless
legal disputes that would end up hurting both women and men.













The photo is from the Library of Congress.



Copyright Notice

   Copyright 2010, 2020 by David Burns.  All rights reserved.